An Analyst (n.) makes his greatest mistake in assuming the patient has a psychology like his own — a projection that may hit the mark once but mostly remains a projection.
An Analyst (n.) who hides behind impersonality sets a bad example — the patient did not get ill from an excess of naturalness, and is not too stupid to notice the little game of prestige.
An Analyst (n.) can discuss only what he has become conscious of through his own experience; what the patient brings beyond it founders on the analyst's unconsciousness — or on a schematic theorem he uses to avoid feeling inferior.
An Analyst (n.) has his own complexes, and so his own blind spots that act as prejudices — hence the demand that he be analysed first.
An Analyst (n.) is exactly as blind to his patient's attitude as to his own unconscious problems, which is why a doctor must be analysed before he practises analysis.
The Analyst (n.) who shows no emotion can be a fool: one bewildered patient was cured in a moment when Jung swore and told her, "Do you think I am an idiot or a catatonic?"
The Analyst (n.) is no superman for having a theory; his knowledge is only a professional advantage that does not keep him out of the fray, and he is tested as much as the patient.
The Analyst (n.) is analysed in every analysis, being as much in it as the patient; psychotherapy is a personal responsibility, not an impersonal method, much as surgeons once failed to wash their hands.