Individuality (n.) is greatly overrated on account of its practical importance — consciousness has differentiated the universal to the point of unrecognizability.
Individuality (n.) left unconscious is projected onto objects, which then carry too much value — without a conscious individual there is only a collective psychology.
Individuality (n.) lies not in the psychic elements but in their unique grouping and combination.
Individuality (n.) has a nucleus that must be separated from the opposing instincts — suffering them, sometimes submitting, but not identical with them — or it dissolves into its pairs of opposites.
Individuality (n.) is a delicate plant; look closely and you are astonished how much of so-called individual psychology is really collective.
Individuality (n.) when perfected realizes the ideal type of its species: the more individual a thing is, the more it develops what is common to humanity.
Individuality (n.) emerges only from behind the veil of the collective — and instinct cannot lift it, for our instinctual nature is essentially collective.
Individuality (n.) when willed is devalued by science as subjectivism and condemned by the Churches as spiritual pride — though Christianity's central symbol is the individual life of the Son of Man.
Individuality (n.) is only relative — the complement of human likeness; if it were absolute, psychology would be an insoluble chaos of opinions.
Individuality (n.) is not under all circumstances an asset, even for the individual: many children save themselves by throwing themselves on the support of a normally functioning group.