An Explanation (n.) can be worse than none: a bogus one — the overloaded stomach, the vibrations — diverts interest and blocks real inquiry.
An Explanation (n.) that is completely rational is possible only for objects we have posited; for anything that actually exists, it is a Utopian ideal.
Explanation (n.) can only be "as I myself understand it" — and therein lies the partiality: by what right do I assume a vision presents itself the same way to everyone?
An Explanation (n.) rests on principles that are only points of view — not the behaviour of things, but the psychological attitude of whoever does the explaining.
An Explanation (n.) is only translation into another metaphor where an archetype is concerned — the most we can do is dream the myth onwards and give it modern dress.
An Explanation (n.) by 'pure chance' says almost nothing: the same explanation would fit equally if the accident had not happened.
An Explanation (n.) first discriminates and divides, then must unite what has been divided — it satisfies only when it achieves a synthesis.
An Explanation (n.) that is simple and therefore delusive must be defended fanatically, like a dogma, because it cannot hold its own against experience.
An Explanation (n.) that is scientific, though factually correct, may clamp the latch on a child's fantasy for good; the mythological one the child prefers may for that very reason be more suitable.
Explanation (n.) by "nothing but" a mother fixation costs the patient his soul: every time you accept it, you replace your soul with a theory.