The Natural man (n.) is no integral unity, as Rousseau dreamed, but thoroughly collective — just as much in others as in himself.
The Natural man (n.) is what the European must find again — not Rousseau's Nature but his own nature; instead he loves systems that repress him.
The Natural man (n.) has an astonishing wholeness, though nothing admirable about it: the same old unconsciousness, apathy and filth.
The Natural man (n.) is not a self but the mass and a particle in the mass, not even sure of his own ego — which is why he has always needed transformation mysteries to turn him into something.
The Natural man (n.) must die in part during his own lifetime.
The Natural man (n.) collides with the demands of culture in confusions, conflicts of duty and invisible tragedies that no penal or moral code, not even the subtlest casuistry, can ever justly judge.
The Natural man (n.) is neither good nor pure; developed only naturally he would differ little from an animal, ruled by instinct and naive unconsciousness untroubled by guilt.