The Good (n.) does not remain good eternally — yet man follows the old ways long after they have become bad, and only with untold suffering sees that what was once good has grown old.
Good (n.) is, for psychology, not a thing in itself but a judgment: what seems suitable, acceptable or valuable from a certain point of view.
Good (n.) becomes meaningless if everything God does or allows is called good — for then evil is good too; yet suffering remains exactly what it was.
Good (n.) done at the wrong time and place may be the worst thing possible, and evil may be good for this person at this stage — not relativism, but the paradox that keeps ethics honest.
Good (n.) is always balanced by an equally substantial evil — if evil were non-existent, whatever there is would have to be good.
Good (n.) pursued to absolute and final victory leads to a dangerous accumulation of evil — and to catastrophe.
Good (n.) cannot be spoken of if there is no evil, any more than light without darkness or above without below.
Good (n.) does not get better by being exaggerated; it gets worse.
Good (n.) could just as logically be called a diminution of evil, as ninety-nine can be called a hundred minus one; if your evil is an unreal shadow of your good, your good is an unreal shadow of your evil.
The Good (n.) handed down from the past can prove a ruthless tyrant — an illusory system of prejudices that emasculates life and enforces an unendurable moral compulsion.