An Image (n.) is archaic when it has unmistakable mythological parallels: archaism is not pseudo-antique imitation but the quality of a relic.
An Image (n.) is not a reflection of an outer object but a figure of fantasy that never takes the place of reality — yet it can represent an inner reality that far outweighs the outer one.
An Image (n.) is a condensed expression of the whole psychic situation of the moment, conscious and unconscious, so it can be interpreted only from their relationship.
Image (n.) born of the soul, worthless to reason, can be spent in four ways: in art, in philosophical speculation, in heresy and the founding of sects — or squandered in every form of licentiousness.
An Image (n.) and meaning are identical: as the image takes shape the meaning becomes clear — the pattern needs no interpretation, it portrays its own meaning.
An Image (n.) tells us everything only in its living context; abstract its “real essence” and it goes cloudy — like dissecting a corpse to learn how it lived.
An Image (n.) is everything of which we are conscious, and image is psyche, so it makes no sense to dismiss the soul as "nothing but" a complex.
Image (n.) are life, while concepts are coined, negotiable values; the archetypal image has only its naked fullness, which the intellect cannot grasp, so its use needs an alert and lively fantasy.
Image (n.) are all we have to speak of divine experience: without them we would be inarticulate, stammering "mana," and even that is an image; God approaches man in symbols, though we cannot know if they are correct.