A Paradox (n.) is where a one-sided intellect ends when it tries to state a conflict that is really psychological: 'both man and no man are rightly called species.'
A Paradox (n.) is the only fitting language for transcendent things, since opposites can only be imagined uniting by annihilating each other.
Paradox (n.) does more justice to the unknowable than clarity can: a single clear meaning robs the mystery of its darkness and passes it off as something known.
A Paradox (n.) is one of our most precious spiritual goods, and singleness of meaning a sign of weakness: only paradox comes near to grasping the fullness of life.
A Paradox (n.) is the very essence of the religious statement, which is logically contradictory — does one equal three? can a mother be a virgin?
A Paradox (n.) cannot be endured by the petty reasoning mind, which once awakened breaks into iconoclastic laughter at the mystery — and no sermon on earth can keep it down.
A Paradox (n.) is a better witness to truth than a one-sided, so-called positive statement.
A Paradox (n.) is the natural way to describe anything unknowable — in terms of opposites — so the alchemists' creatum increatum need not rack our brains.
Paradox (n.) clusters most thickly round the alchemists' arcane substance, since they tried to express the opposites in one breath: base and precious, seen by all yet known by none, "this stone which is no stone."
Paradox (n.) is where knowledge always ends up at its limits: the One may be like a man, determined and determinable yet undetermined and indeterminable.